Creative Problem-Solving Tasks and Mathematical Creativity: A Second-Order Construct Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v8i2.944Keywords:
Creative problem-solving tasks, Creative self-efficacy, Integer operations, Mathematical creativity, Mathematical thinking, Quasi-experimental designAbstract
This study aimed to address a research gap by examining the effect of Creative Problem-Solving Tasks (CPST) on students’ creative self-efficacy and creative thinking ability in solving integer operation problems. A quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group was employed, involving 60 seventh-grade students from two public junior high schools. Participants were divided into an experimental group (CPST-based instruction) and a control group (conventional instruction). Instruments included a creative self-efficacy questionnaire and an open-ended mathematical creative thinking test contextualized in integer operations. Data were analyzed using independent sample t-tests and confirmatory factor analysis. The t-test results showed significant differences between the experimental and control groups in both self-efficacy scores (t(58) = 11.56, p < 0.001) and creative thinking ability (t(58) = 5.22, p < 0.001). The experimental group demonstrated consistent improvement in the dimensions of fluency, flexibility, and originality. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the structure of mathematical creativity as a second-order construct. These findings indicate that implementing CPST in mathematics instruction significantly enhances students’ confidence and fosters the development of creative thinking simultaneously. The implication of this study highlights the importance of instructional approaches that integrate both affective and cognitive dimensions to support mathematical creativity, particularly in complex topics such as integer operations.
References
Baity, N. (2021). The effect of creative problem solving learning models on problem solving ability in learning motivation and student self-efficacy view. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04(03).https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i3-30
Bales, M. and Estomo, R. (2022). Mathematical creativity, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematics problem-solving performance of high school students in different curricular programs. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 286-294.https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.2022.3.9.6
Biçer, A., Bicer, A., Capraro, M., & Lee, Y. (2023). Mathematical connection is at the heart of mathematical creativity. Creativity Theories – Research – Applications, 10(1-2), 17-40.https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2023-0002
Faradillah, A. and Purwitasari, A. (2022). The effectivenes of the missouri mathematics project model on creative thinking ability and self-efficacy. Jipm (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 11(1), 170.https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v11i1.13161
Gregory, L., Villarosa, A., Ramjan, L., Hughes, M., O’Reilly, R., Stunden, A., … & Salamonson, Y. (2019). The influence of mathematics self‐efficacy on numeracy performance in first‐year nursing students: a quasi‐experimental study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(19-20), 3651-3659.https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14963
Haavold, P. (2016). An empirical investigation of a theoretical model for mathematical creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(3), 226-239.https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.145
Hafizi, M. and Kamarudin, N. (2020). Creativity in mathematics: malaysian perspective. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3C), 77-84.https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081609
Hayati, P., Mistima, M., & Mahmud, M. (2023). The relationship between teacher’s self- efficacy and creative teaching of primary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(5), 340.https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0141
Herianto, H., Sofroniou, A., Fitrah, M. (2024). Quantifying the relationship between self‑efficacy and mathematical creativity: A meta‑analysis. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111251
Hidayatullah, A., Abidin, R., & Muqit, A. (2024). Motivation and behavioral engagement: The mediating role of mathematics self-efficacy in primary education. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 17(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2024.170306
Ibrahim, I., & Widodo, S. (2020). Advocacy approach with open-ended problems to mathematical creative thinking ability. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p93-102
Ibrahim, I., Khalil, I., & Prahmana, R. (2023). Mathematics learning orientation: mathematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition?. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 253-276.https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp253-276
Iftitah, N., Arsyad, M., & Palloan, P. (2023). The Influence of the Problem Based Learning Model and Self Efficacy on the Creative Thinking Ability of Class XI MIPA Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Ipa, 9(12), 10808-10815. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4734
Kwon, K., Park, H., & Lee, S. (2025). A meta-analysis of STEM project-based learning on creativity[J]. STEM Education, 2025, 5(2): 275-290. doi: http://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/steme.2025014
Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 159–166.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0459-1
Ma, Y. F. (2025). The effect of teaching approaches and curriculum designs in reducing mathematics anxiety: A mini‑review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1656419.10.3389/feduc.2025.1656419
Meier, M. A., Burgstaller, J. A., Benedek, M., Vogel, S. E., & Grabner, R. H. (2021). Mathematical Creativity in Adults: Its Measurement and Its Relation to Intelligence, Mathematical Competence and General Creativity. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010010
Muhtadi, A., Assagaf, G., & Hukom, J. (2022). Self‑efficacy and students’ mathematics learning ability in Indonesia: A meta‑analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 1131–1146. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15360a
Niu, W., Li, C., Duan, D., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Impact of perceived supportive learning environment on mathematical achievement: the mediating roles of autonomous self- regulation and creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781594
Orakçı, Ş. and Durnalı, M. (2022). The mediating effects of metacognition and creative thinking on the relationship between teachers' autonomy support and teachers' self‐efficacy. Psychology in the Schools, 60(1), 162-181.https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22770
Piasta, S. B., Farley, K. S., Mauck, S. A., Soto Ramirez, P., Schachter, R. E., O'Connell, A. A., Justice, L. M., Spear, C. F., & Weber-Mayrer, M. (2020). At-scale, state-sponsored language and literacy professional development: Impacts on early childhood classroom practices and children’s outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000380
Purwati, P., et al. (2025). Mathematical Self-Efficacy and Creative Thinking in Social Arithmetic: Insight from Junior High School students in Papua. https://journals2.ums.ac.id/varidika/article/view/10837
Rima K, R., Nurjanah, S., & Cahya, A. (2024). Students’ learning obstacle in operations of integer. (2024). Educenter : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.55904/educenter.v3i1.1107
Zhang, W., Chen, Q., & Sun, J. (2023). Project‑based learning and students’ affect and higher‑order thinking in STEM: A meta‑analytic review. PLOS ONE, 18(6), e0287365. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287365
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Purwati Purwati, Tri Candra Wulandari, Sandha Soemantri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Journal of Honai Math Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/jhm/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Journal of Honai Math agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
