PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY OF STUDENTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPULSION STYLE BASED ON SOLO TAXONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v4i2.176Keywords:
Cognitive Style, Impulsive, Problem Solving, Superitem TestAbstract
The problem-solving ability between reflective and impulsive subjects from several studies shows that reflective subjects are always superior than impulsive subjects. The purpose of this study was to identificate and to describe students' problem-solving abilities with impulsive cognitive style in solving superitem test problems and their characteristics. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The data collection techniques used were the MFFT test, the superitem test, and interviews. Based on the results of the superitem test, it shows that the two impulsive subjects have differences in achieving the level of problem-solving ability thinking. Impulsive-01 subjects can reach all thinking levels based on SOLO taxonomy while impulsive-02 subjects can only solve problems at the unistructural level. Although the research shows that the impulsive-01 subject has the characteristics of being fast, less accurate, less thorough, and seeming rushed in solving problems, the subject can finish up to the extended abstract level. The impulsive-02 is able to connect by making assumptions in solving the problem, it's just that the inability to solve this problem due to not understand the problem.
References
Aini, Rahma Nur., Murtianto, Yanuar Hery., & Prasetyowatu, Dina. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Spasial Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. IMAJINER: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(5), 90 – 96.
Akhsani, L., dan Jaelani, A. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa melalui Metode Snow Ball Throwing pada Mata Kuliah Teori Graf. KONTINU: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 2 (1), 48 – 59.
Anggraeni, Anggraeni, Rusmala E., Wulan, Eka R., & Utomo, Bendot T. (2019). Pemecahan Masalah Polya Dari Siswa Smp Bergaya Kognitif Field Dependent Dan Field-Independent. Journal of The Indonesian Matematics Education Society, 1 (1), 11 – 18.
Appulembang, Oce D. (2017). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Aljabar Berpandu pada Taksonomi SOLO Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Makale Tana Toraja. POLYGLOT: Jurnal Ilmiah, 13 (2), 133 – 150.
Azhik, Imam M. & Ernawati, A. (2016). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP pada Materi Perbandingan Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. Prosiding SENDIKMAD: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, 1, 125 – 135.
Erviana Tanti. (2019). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Aljabar Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Field Independent. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 1 (1), 61 – 73.
Fadiana Mu’jizatin (2016). Perbedaan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita antara Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. JRAMathEdu: Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 1 (1), 79 – 89.
Hayuningrat, S., & Listiawan, T. (2018). Proses Berpikir Siswa dengan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Generalisasi Pola. Jurnal Elemen, 4 (2), 183 – 196.
Komalasari, Lala Intan. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa dan Guru SMK dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. HISTOGRAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3 (2), 189 – 198.
Maimunah M., Purwanto P., Sa’dijah C., & Sisworo S. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas X-A SMA Al-Muslimun. JRPM: Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 17 – 30.
Miatun, A., & Nurafni, N. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflective dan Impulsive. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 150-164
Moleong, Lexy J. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nengsih, L., Susiswo, S., & Sa’dijah, C. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar dengan Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(2), 143 – 148.
Nurmutia, Halida E. (2019) Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. EDUMATIKA: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 98 – 103.
Rahmatina, S., Sumarmo, U., & Johar, R. (2014) Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1 (1), 62 – 70.
Rismen, S., Juwita, R. & Devinda, U. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 4 (1), 163 – 171
Soemantri, Sandha. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo Terhadap Tingkat Kesalahan Siswa. Didaktis: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 18 (1), 74 – 85.
Sumadi, S., Putra, Teguh Y., & Astutik, Heny S. (2020). Proses Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMA Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Majemuk. JHM: Journal of Honai Math, 3 (2), 123 – 144
Wahyuniar, Lilia S., Shofia, Niska, & Rochana. (2018). Proses Berpikir Aljabar Siswa MTs Kelas VIII menurut Taksonomi SOLO ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro, 7 (2), 275-282
Warli (2013). Kreativitas Siswa SMP yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif atau Impulsif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang, 20 (2), 190 – 201.
Widjajanti, Djamilah B. (2009). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika: Apa dan Bagaimana Mengembangkannya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, Yogyakarta, 402 – 413.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Journal of Honai Math Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/jhm/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Journal of Honai Math agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.