MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CORE, SCRAMBLE, HASIL BELAJAR, DAN OPERASI HITUNG BENTUK ALJABAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v4i1.175Keywords:
Learning Outcomes, Arithmetic Operation of Algebraic Forms, CORE Learning Model, Scramble Learning ModelAbstract
The learning model has an essential role in student learning outcomes. Each learning model has different contributions, such as the Scramble learning model, which can make students think quickly, and the CORE learning model can train students to think critically. Thus, this study aims to compare students' learning outcomes with the two models, especially in arithmetic operations in algebraic forms. The research method used is quantitative research with a posttest-only group design classified as a quasi-experimental design. The research population was forty-five seventh-grade students, which were divided into two categories. The test instrument used is a description of five questions used to evaluate student learning outcomes. The study results analyzed statistically using the t-test showed that there were differences in student learning outcomes between the two groups of students. Furthermore, the continued test using Pairwise Comparison showed that students taught with the Scramble learning model had better learning outcomes than students acquainted with the CORE learning model.
References
Aliyah, I. M., Yuhana, Y., & Santosa, C. A. H. F. (2019). Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal dan Gender. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 6(2), 161-178.
Bailang, I., Emor, J., & Wenas, J. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Scramble Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Materi Persamaan Linear Satu Variabel. Jurnal Sains, Matematika, & Edukasi FMIPA Unima, 5(2), 132–137.
Fitrianti, A., Abidin, Z., & Alifiani. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Scramble dengan Media Question Card untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Pada Materi Statistika Kelas VIII-A SMP Wahid Hasyim Malang. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 14(6), 87-92.
Hariyanto. (2016). Penerapan Model Core dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa. Jurnal Gammath, 1(2), 33–40.
Huda, M. (2013). Cooperative Learning Metode, Teknik, Struktur, dan Model Penerapan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Indarwati, C., Kriswandani, & Yuniana, T. (2018). Perbedaan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Bagi Siswa yang Diberi Model PBI dan Core bagi Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Ampel Kabupaten Boyolali. Jurnal Mitra Pendidikan, 2(1), 11–22.
Irsyad, Y. M., Sulastri, & Hidayah, I. (2019). Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas VII G melalui Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Question Cards di SMPN 22 Semarang. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 466–472.
Laamena, C. M. (2019). Strategi Scaffolding berdasarkan Gaya Belajar dan Argumentasi Siswa: Studi Kasus pada Pembelajaran Pola Bilangan. Barekeng: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan, 13(2), 85-92.
Laurens, T., & Laamena, C. M. (2020). Development of Mathematical Learning Devices Based on Multimedia on Circle Materials of Grade Eighth of Junior High School. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1470(1), 012088.
Manalu, W. R., & Siregar, E. Y. (2019). Efektivitas Model Pembelajarn Scramble terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa di SMP Negeri 2 Pandan. Jurnal MathEdu, 2(2), 93–98.
Maskur, R. Permatasari, D. dan Rakhmawati, R.M. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Berbasis Rhythm Reading Vocal pada Materi Konsep Pecahan Kelas VII SMP. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(1), 78-87.
Pasani, C. F., Kusumawati, E., & Imanisa, D. (2018). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Scramble dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Membina Karakter Tanggung Jawab dan Disiplin Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 178–188.
Prawoto, A. (2012). Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Based Brain Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika. Tesis. Bandung: Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Purwanto. (2009). Prinsip-Prinsip Dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Putri, J. W. & Riwayati, S. (2017). Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa pada Model Pembelajaran Conneted Mathematics Project (CMP). Fibonacci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 3(2), 161-168.
Putri, F. M. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Dasar Layanan Jurusan Non Eksak. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 2(1), 44-52
Ratumanan, T. G. & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Surabaya: Unessa University Press.
Shoimin, A. (2014). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Souhoka, F. P., Ayal, C. S., & Laamena, C. M. (2019). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make a Match dan Model Pembelajaran Konvensional Pada Materi Statistika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pattimura.
Subanji. (2015). Teori Kesalahan Konstruksi Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah. Matematika. Malang: UM Press
Sugiarti, L. (2017). Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Operasi Bentuk Aljabar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Etnomatnesia, 323–330.
Sukardi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Sukartiningsih. (2020). Peningkatan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Materi Operasi Bentuk Aljabar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share dengan Love Notes Peserta Didik Kelas VII. Kreatif, Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar, 10(2), 170-181.
Sumartono & Normalina. (2015). Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Scramble di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 84–91.
Yudhawati, R., & Haryanto, D. (2011). Teori-teori Dasar Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Journal of Honai Math Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/jhm/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Journal of Honai Math agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
