PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD DENGAN STRATEGI PENUGASAN MULTI LEVEL INSTRUCTION PADA MATERI MATEMATIKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v2i1.54Keywords:
cooperative STAD, multi level instruction, peer tutoringAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the activities, responses, and student learning outcomes with multilevel instruction learning. Multilevel instruction assignment learning strategy is a selling system adoption from multi-level marketing strategy with special characteristics that there are students in the first level and second level downlines and a teacher as an upline. Type of research is quasi-experimental by comparing two experimental groups. Experimental group one was given the STAD model with multilevel instruction, and the other group was given regular STAD model. The research instruments used were student activity observation sheets, student response questionnaires, and learning outcomes test. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively and inferentially. The result indicates that both of them are effective to be applied in mathematics learning, but inferentially the outcomes of the experiment group one were higher than the experiment group two.References
Ahmad. (2015). Komparasi Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Aritmatika Sosial Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan NHT Kelas VII SMP Negeri 4 Maritengngae Kabupaten Sidrap. Tesis, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar.
Ardin. (2013). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Setting Kooperatif Tipe NHT pada Materi Pokok Ruang Dimensi Tiga. Tesis, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar.
Budiningsih, C.A. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Duran, D. (2010). Cooperative interactions in peer tutoring: Patterns and sequences in paired writing. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5 (1).
Evans, W & Flower, J. (2001). Peer tutoring in first year undergradute mathematics. International Journal Mah, Educ, Sci, Technol, 32 (2).
Gafar, L. (2013). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Untuk Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Di Kelas Vii Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya.
Gordon & Edward, E. (2005). Peer Tutoring: a Teachers’s Resource Guide. Scarecrow Education, USA.
Iskandar, A. M. (2013). Interpersonal Communication on Applied. Jakarta: Orbit Publishing.
Isnachun, M. (2010). Efektifitas Multi Level Tutorial Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Matriks Kelas X IPS 3 SMK Negeri Semarang. IKIP PGRI, Semarang.
Ismiyati. (2011). Efektivitas multi level tutorial dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi himpunan kelas vii mts nurul huda dempet. IAIN Walisongo, Semarang.
Johnson, L. (2008). Pengajaran yang kreatif dan menarik (original title: Teaching Outside the Box, How to Grab Your Students by Their Brains). Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Lafleur, P. & Bluffs, C. (2010). Peer Tutoring: Student Achievement, Confidence and The Teacher’s Role. Action Research Project Report. University of Nebraska-Lincoln: Department of Mathemacis
Maisaroh & Rostrieningsih. (2010). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pembelajaran Active Learning Tipe Quiz Team pada Mata Pelajaran Keterampilan Dasar Komunikasi di SMK Negeri 1 Bogor. Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, 8 (2): 157 – 172.
Nurwidiyanto. (2009). Perbandingan Keefektifan Model Kooperatif Multi Level, Model Group Investigation, dan Model Advance Organizer Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dengan Materi Penerapan Fungsi Linier dan Kuadrat pada Matematika Ekonomi Siswa Kelas Xi Semester Genap Program Kejuruan Akuntansi dan Penjualan SMK YPPM Boja Kabupaten Kendal Tahun 2009/2010. IKIP PGRI, Semarang.
NWT Teacher Induction. Professional Advice Multi-level InstructionH. Diakses 4 Februari 2014, dari http://www.newteachersnwt.ca/professional_advice2.html
YPatta, R. (2013). Efektivitas Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray dan Tipe Jigsaw Pada Materi Bangun Datar Siswa Kelas VII Smp. Tesis, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar.
Peterson, M. (2002). Pricples of Authentic Multi-Level Instructionor. Michigan, Multi-level teaching wok group whole schooling consortium.
Petocz, P., Duke, M., Bilgin, A., & Reid, A. (2012). Exploring peer learning (student to student, lecturer to lecturer). Asian Social Science, 21838 (114). Macquire University: Canadian Center of Science and Education.
Rusman. (2013). Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tri Wibowo, B.S. (2013). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Mandiri. (Original work published Santrock, J.W. 2004)
Saputro, W.A. (2005). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Pada Pokok Bahasan Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Kelas II SLTP. Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya
Siswoyo, D. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Diakses 11 Februari 2015, dari http://dedi26.blogspot.com/2013/02/apa-itu-matematika-pengertian.html
Slavin, R. E. (2010). Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Somalinggi. (2013). Komparasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Dan Tipe Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Berbantuan Multimedia Interaktif terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematis Pada Siswa Smp Kelas VIII. Tesis. Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar
Sudijono, A. (2005). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sudjana, N., & Rivai, A. (2001). Media Pengajaran: Penggunaan dan Pembuatannya. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Suharso dan Retnoningsih, A. (2005). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Ed. Lux). Semarang: CV. Widya Karya.
Suryani, A. (2009). Pengaruh Manajemen Waktu dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas X MAN Maguwoharjo Sleman. Skripsi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta.
Topping, K. J. (2011). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education (Vol. 32, No. 3 p. 321-345). Kluwer Academic Publisher, Netherland.
Tiro, M. A. (2010). Cara Efektif Belajar Matematika. Makassar: Andira Publisher.
Tiro, M. A., & Sukarna. (2013). Metode Ellips dalam Analisis Data Kuantitatif. Makassar: Andira Publisher.
Yaumi, M. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran Disesuaikan dengan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kencana.
Young, E. (2011). On Site Peer Tutoring in Mathematics Content Courses for Pre-service Teachers. IUMPST, Vol. 2 (February 2011). Texas: College Research Enchancement Program
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Journal of Honai Math Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/jhm/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Journal of Honai Math agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
