Analysis of the formative assessment implementation and its challenges in high school biology learning

Authors

  • Alvi Anggraeni Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tidar
  • Shefa Dwiyanti Ramadani Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tidar
  • Ericka Darmawan Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v6i1.1238

Keywords:

Biology learning, formative assessment, learning evaluation

Abstract

The implementation of formative assessment in biology learning at the senior high school level in Magelang City has not been widely explored. This study aims to analyze the implementation of formative assessment and identify the challenges faced by biology teachers. The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving biology teachers and ten senior high school students in Magelang City. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and observations, and analyzed using data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing techniques. The findings indicate that formative assessment was implemented through information collection activities such as question-and-answer sessions, quizzes, and reflections, followed by information processing based on students’ level of understanding and minimum competency criteri, as well as follow-up actions in the form of remedial and enrichment activities. The implementation of formative assessment was categorized as good because it effectively monitored students’ understanding and positively contributed to learning outcomes and science process skills. However, several challenges were identified, particularly limited instructional time and inadequate facilities and infrastructure. This study highlights the importance of formative assessment in supporting effective biology learning and suggests strengthening infrastructure support, providing continuous teacher training, and enhancing collaboration among teachers, students, and parents to optimize its implementation.

References

Adriantoni, A. Yanre, M. A., Gusneti, I., & Angraini, S. (2025). Menilai Bukan Sekedar Menghitung: Peran Asesmen Formatif Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP Universitas Mandiri, 11(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v11i02.5976

Al Fraidan, A. (2025). Test anxiety across writing formats: The mediating role of perceived teacher strictness. Acta Psychologica, 256, 104942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104942

AlAli, R. M., & Al-Barakat, A. A. (2025). Enhancing young children’s science learning through science teachers’ formative assessment practices. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1503088

Altika, W., Indryani, I., & Hasni, U. (2023). Perkembangan dan Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini di TK IT Al-Azka Kota Jambi. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 13501–13513. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/1944

Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500135921

Dilfa, A. H., Sulaiman, S., Grave, A. De, Rosidin, Donasari, E. I. F. R., Putri, N. W. S., Ariana, A. A. G. B., Siahaan, F. M. M., Nasrullah, A. M. A., & Rifai, A. (2023). Pengembangan Dan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. PT. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup

Fajeriadi, H., Fahmi, F. Nugroho, B. A., & Fitriani, A. (2023). Inovasi Metode Asesmen Formatif Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep: Studi Literatur. Indonesian Journal of Science Education And Applied Science (Ijseas), 3(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.20527/i.v3i2.13689

Ma’rifati, R. K. D. N., Amin, F., & Rifa’, A. A. (2024). Profesionalisme Guru Dalam Asesmen Formatif Dan Sumatif Pada Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka. Tadris : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam, 18(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.51675/jt.v18i1.892

Mailani, R. D., Aswad, F. H., & Siswoyo, S. (2025). Kendala Dalam Penerapan Penilaian Formatif (Studi Kasus Di SMP Negeri 2 Wonosobo). JMPA (Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Al-Multazam) 7,(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.54892/jmpa.v7i1.68

Ndari, W., Suyatno, S., Sukirman, S., & Mahmudah, F. N. (2023). Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum and Its Challenges. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(3), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.648

Pertiwi, B. (2017). Pengembangan Asesmen Formatif Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Sains Materi Sistem Sirkulasi Di SMA Al-Azhar 3 [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung]. UINRIL Campus Repository. Https://Repository.Radenintan.Ac.Id/627/1/Skripsi_Bunga_Pertiwi.Pdf

Pranata, J., & Wijoyo, H. (2020). Analisis Upaya Mengembangkan Kurikulum Sekolah Minggu Buddha (SMB) Taman Lumbini Tebango Lombok Utara. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan , 2, 778–786. https://prosiding.unma.ac.id/index.php/semnasfkip/article/view/389

Rahmawati, I. L., Hartono, H., & Nugroho, S. E. (2015). Pengembangan Asesmen Formatif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Self Regulation Siswa Pada Tema Suhu Dan Perubahannya. Unnes Science Education Journal, 4(2), 841–850. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v4i2.7922

Shafii, R. A., & Berger, J. L. (2025). Teacher assessment literacy, formative assessment practices, and their perceived efficacy in Tanzania: A scoping review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 86, 101496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101496

Sudijono, A. (2005). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Rajawali Pers

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta

Syah, W. F., & Jaeni, M. (2023). Peran Kompetensi Profesional Guru Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa di MI Islam Paweden. Journal of Islamic Elementary Education, 3(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.28918/ijiee.v3i1.7337

Tanzeh, A., & Suyitno. (2006). Dasar Dasar Penelitian. eL-sKAF

Wahyudin, D. (2014). Manajemen Kurikulum. Remaja Rosdakarya

Wiliam, D. (2017). Embedded formative assessment: (Strategies for classroom assessment that drives student engagement and learning). Solution Tree Press

Yan, Z., Chiu, M. M., & Keung Cheng, E. C. (2022). Predicting teachers’ formative assessment practices: Teacher personal and contextual factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, 103718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103718

Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3), 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884042

Zhai, X., Li, M., & Guo, Y. (2018). Teachers’ use of learning progression-based formative assessment to inform teachers’ instructional adjustment: A case study of two physics teachers’ instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1832–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1512772

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Anggraeni, A., Ramadani, S. D., & Darmawan, E. (2026). Analysis of the formative assessment implementation and its challenges in high school biology learning. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 6(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v6i1.1238

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.