Team assisted individualization (TAI): The effect on students' cognitive learning outcomes

Authors

  • Jimmy Alan Rengiar Universitas Papua, Indonesia
  • Heru Joko Budirianto Universitas Papua, Indonesia
  • Keliopas Krey Universitas Papua, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v1i2.255

Keywords:

Biology, student cognitive, collaborative, TAI

Abstract

This research aims to see the effect of Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning on students' cognitive learning outcomes. Experimental research has been carried out with a pretest-posttest design on 66 high school students. They were divided into two groups (33 students in the TAI class and 33 students in the non-TAI class). Students' cognitive abilities were measured using twenty multiple-choice questions. Data analysis using t-test until free. The findings showed p > 0.05 for pretest data and p < 0.05 for posttest data. This research found that students' initial abilities were the same, but students' final abilities were different. This experimental research concludes that the achievement of cognitive outcomes of students in the TAI class is better than the achievement of cognitive outcomes of students in the non-TAI class. The differences in learning that occurred in the two classes caused the final results to be significantly different.

References

Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., Colgrove, C. A., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2011). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061

Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20462

Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205

Connell, G. L., Donovan, D. A., & Chambers, T. G. (2016). Increasing the use of student-centered pedagogies from moderate to high improves student learning and attitudes about biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-03-0062

Damopolii, I., Yohanita, A. M., Nurhidaya, N., & Murtijani, M. (2018). Meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 6(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i1.8029

Frabun, R. F., Iwan, I., & Wambrauw, H. L. (2018). The effectiveness of laboratory use in supporting biology practicums in high schools throughout Manokwari Regency. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v1i1.109

Haryati, A., & Kamal, M. (2016). Penggunaan model Team Assisted Individualization untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 47–60. Retrieved from https://riset-iaid.net/index.php/jppi/article/view/15

Hufford, T. L. (2017). The Role of the Undergraduate Student in Teaching and Learning Biology. Atlas Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.5147/ajse.v1i2.73

Luqman, M., Utami, B., & Ashadi, A. (2016). Penerapan model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) disertai handout untuk meningkatkan motivasi, keaktifan, dan prestasi belajar siswa pada materi pokok kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan kelas XI IPA 4 SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Karanganyar. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 5(4), 26–33. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/kimia/article/view/9023/6918

Nneji, L. (2011). Impact of framing and team assisted individualized instructional strategies students’achievement in basic science in the North Central Zone of Nigeria. Knowledge Review, 23(4), 1–8. Retrieved from https://globalacademicgroup.com/journals/knowledge review/impact of framing and team assisted individualized.pdf

Posangi, N. W., Hasan, A. M., & Dama, L. (2018). Standardization of science process skills (SPS) assessment instruments in microbiology labs. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 1(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v1i1.32

Rudi, L. (2017). Application of Teaching Model of Team Assisted Individualization [TAI] In Basic Chemistry Courses in Students of Forestry and Science of Environmental Universtias Halu Oleo. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(11), 69–76. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/2017/November-2017/07.pdf

Samara, N., Yohanita, A. M., & Iwan, I. (2018). Application of problem-solving learning models to improve the activity and students’ learning outcomes of SMA Kristen YABT Manokwari. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 1(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v1i1.38

Shillahaque, G. P., Mulyani, B., & Setyowati, W. A. E. (2015). Penerapan model pembelajaran team assisted individualization dengan media key-relation chart untuk meningkatkan rasa ingin tahu dan prestasi belajar siswa pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan siswa kelas XI MIA 1 SMA Negeri 5 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 4(4), 80–86. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/kimia/article/view/6608/4501

Sugiyarto, K. H., Ikhsan, J., & Lukman, I. R. (2018). The use of an android–based-game in the team assisted individualization to improve students’ creativity and cognitive achievement in chemistry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022, 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012037

Tal, T., & Tsaushu, M. (2018). Student-centered introductory biology course: evidence for deep learning. Journal of Biological Education, 52(4), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1385508

Tinungki, G. M. (2015). The Role of Cooperative Learning Type Team Assisted Individualization to Improve the Students’ Mathematics Communication Ability in the Subject of Probability Theory. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 27–31. Retrieved from https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/27313

Wardani, R. A. K., Mardiyana, M., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2017). The comparison of team assisted individualization and think pair share with guided note taking on relation and function viewed from adversity quotient student. Proceedings Education and Language International Conference, 1(747–753).

Watem, M., Nunaki, J. H., & Wambrauw, H. L. (2018). Profile of infrastructure and pedagogic competencies of teachers in SMP and SMA/SMK in Waisai District, Raja Ampat Regency, West Papua Province. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 1(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v1i1.16

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2018-05-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.