Instrument Test Kinematics: How Velocity and Acceleration Vectors Captured by High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v7i2.572Keywords:
Acceleration, kinematics, vector, velocityAbstract
Vectors in kinematics are rarely highlighted in high school. Even though vectors are the language used by physicists. This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the test instrument developed and to explore the ability of vectors in kinematics of high school students. The method used in this research is research and development of the 4D model. The developed test instrument for vectors in kinematics is in the form of multiple choice with an arrow direction accompanied by a command to describe the vector and explain the reason for choosing the vector direction. The test instrument covers one- and two-dimensional kinematics topics by highlighting the concepts of velocity and acceleration. Two-dimensional kinematics is divided into constant velocity and increasing velocity. This test instrument consists of thirteen questions with an average point-biserial coefficient of 0.493 and KR-20 of 0.784. Then, this test instrument was used to measure the vector ability in kinematics of high school students with a sample size of sixty-seven students. It was found that most high school students had difficulty in acceleration as two-dimensional vector, acceleration as one-dimensional vector, and velocity as one-dimensional vector with few obstacles. Learning with the method of integrating vectors in kinematics has the possibility to solve this problem.References
Agriawan, M. N., Saldi, M. & Kadir, M. R. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Gerak Lurus pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika SMA. Phydagogic Jurnal Fisika dan Pembelajarannya, 2(2), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.31605/phy.v2i2.1492
Annisa, R., Astuti, B. & Mindyarto, B. N. (2019). Tes Diagnostik Four Tier untuk Identifikasi Pemahaman dan Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Gerak Melingkar Beraturan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v5i1.3546
Beichner, R. J. (1996). The Impact of Video Motion Analysis on Kinematics Graph Interpretation Skills. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1272–1277. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390
Doran, R. I. (1980). Basic Measurement and Evaluation of Science Instruction. National Science Teacher Association.
Firdaus, H. N. & Mindyarto, B. N. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Berbasis Badge dalam Moodle pada Materi Gerak Lurus. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 11(1), 109–118.
Flores, S. & Kanim, S. E. (2004). Student Use of Vectors in Introductory Mechanics. American Association of Physics Teachers, 72(4), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1648686
Handhika, J., Sasono, M., Huriawati, F., Maisaroh, M. & Aritonang, J. (2023). Development of an Instrument to Test Understanding Kinematic Concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 9(2), 79–86. http://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v9i2.17978
Heckler, A. F. & Scaife, T. M. (2015). Adding and Subtracting Vectors: The Problem with the Arrow Representation. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010101
Hestenes, D. & Wells, M. (1998). Mechanics Baseline Test. American Modeling Teachers Association.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
Hutton, S. (2016). Formative Assessment in the Classroom. In Center For Teaching and Learning Excellence, Park University (Issue May). http://www.park.edu/cetl/quicktips/formative.html
Jewaru, A. A. L., Umrotul, U., Kusairi, S. & Pramono, N. A. (2021). Senior High School Students Understanding of Vector Concepts in Mathematical and Physical Representations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043433
Jufriadi, A., Sutopo, Kusairi, S. & Sunaryono. (2023). Assessment of Kinematic Concepts Comprehension: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(3), 1449–1459. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24546
Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Elby, A. & Gupta, A. (2020). Assessing Mathematical Sensemaking in Physics Through Calculation-Concept Crossover. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020109
Latifa, B. R. A., Purwaningsih, E. & Sutopo, S. (2021). Identification of Students’ Difficulties in Understanding of Vector Concepts Using Test of Understanding of Vector. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2098(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012018
Lichtenberger, A., Wagner, C., Hofer, S. I., Stern, E. & Vaterlaus, A. (2017). Validation and Structural Analysis of The Kinematics Concept Test. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115
Lichtenberger, Andreas, Vaterlaus, A. & Wagner, C. (2014). Analysis of Student Concept Knowledge in Kinematics. Proceedings of the ESERA the 2013th E-Book Conference: Teaching and Coherence in Learning Science Education Research for Evidence Based, 11, 38–50.
Mashood, K. K. & Singh, V. A. (2012). An Inventory on Rotational Kinematics of A Particle: Unravelling Misconceptions and Pitfalls in Reasoning. European Journal of Physics, 33(5), 1301–1312. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/5/1301
Mashood, K. K. & Singh, V. A. (2015). Rotational Kinematics of a Rigid Body About a Fixed Axis: Development and Analysis of an Inventory. European Journal of Physics, 36(4), 45020. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/4/045020
Nurilma, F. R., Supriana, E. & Diantoro, M. (2023). Using STEM-Based 3D-Multimedia to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Uniform Circular Motion. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.10785
Olsho, A., Zimmerman, C. & Brahmia, S. W. (2023). A framework for Characterizing Covariational Reasoning in Physics. 1–17. http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06941
Ramadhani, N. N. & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Five-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument for Uniform Circular Motion Concepts: Development, Validity, Reliability and Limited Trials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i1.4763
Redish, E. (2021). Using Math in Physics: 4. Toy models . The Physics Teacher, 59(9), 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0025840
Redish, E. F. (2021). Using Math in Physics: 7.Telling the story. The Physics Teacher, 59(7), 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0159037
Reif, F. & Allen, S. (1992). Cognition for Interpreting Scientific Concepts: A Study of Acceleration. Cognition and Instruction, 9(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0901_1
Sari, I. P. M. & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Konsepsi Lima Tingkat pada Materi Gerak Lurus: Pengembangan, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas serta Uji Coba Terbatas. Pendipa Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.2.152-162
Serway, R. . & Jewett, J. . (2014). Physics for Scientist and Engineers with Modern Physics 9th Edition.
Shaffer, P. S. & McDermott, L. C. (2005). A Research-Based Approach to Improving Student Understanding of The Vector Nature of Kinematical Concepts. American Journal of Physics, 73(10), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2000976
Susac, A., Planinic, M., Klemencic, D. & Milin Sipus, Z. (2018). Using the Rasch Model to Analyze the Test of Understanding of Vectors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 23101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.023101
Sutopo & Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of a Representational Approach on Students’ Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in Learning Mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9431-y
Tairab, H., Al Arabi, K., Rabbani, L. & Hamad, S. (2020). Examining Grade 11 Science Students’ Difficulties in Learning About Vector Operations. Physics Education, 55(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aba107
Thiagarajan, Si, Semmel, DS, Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional Develoment for Traning Teacher of Exeptional Children: A Sourcebook (p. 194).
Trowbridge, D. E. & McDermott, L. C. (1980). Investigation of Student Understanding of the Concept of Velocity in One Dimension. American Journal of Physics, 48(12), 1020–1028. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12298
Trowbridge, D. E. & McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of Student Understanding of the Concept of Acceleration in One Dimension. American Journal of Physics, 49(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12525
Ulfa, M. & Sucahyo, I. (2022). Development of HOTS-Based E-Modules Using Sigil Applications on Circular Motion Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v10i2.7411
Viyanti, V., Rosidin, U., Suyatna, A. & Laraswati, M. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Hots dengan Variasi Stimulus Berbasis IT pada Materi Kinematika. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v10i1.18632
Walker, J., Halliday, D. & Resnick, R. (2014). Fundamentals of Physics. In Wiley (10th ed.).
Wandi, W., Mardianti, F., Suwarma, I. R. & Liliawati, W. (2023). Theory and Practice of Conceptual Understanding in Physics Education: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Recent Decades. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 6(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v6i2.483
Zavala, G., Tejeda, S., Barniol, P. & Beichner, R. J. (2017). Modifying the Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020111
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Universitas Papua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Whatsapp 