Item Analysis Using Rasch Model in Semester Final Exam Evaluation Study Subject in Physics Class X TKJ SMK Negeri 2 Manokwari

Authors

  • Jefri Palimbong Universitas Papua
  • Mujasam Mujasam Universitas Papua
  • Alberto Yonathan Tangke Allo Universitas Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v1i1.40

Keywords:

item analysis, evaluate learn, rasch model

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to item analyze in semester final exam evaluation using Rasch
model in terms of validity, reliability, and difficulty level study subject in physics class X TKJ SMK Negeri 2
Manokwari. This research was a qualitative research that is evaluation of learning outcomes using
quantitative descriptive method with data collection techniques used documentation. The data of respondents
44 students with the number of items 30 questions, obtained the result are the validity of the conformity level
of item 26 questions was fit and 4 questions not fit. The students reliability 0,37 is weak, the item reliability
0,83 is good and the reliability between students with item 0,42 is bad. The difficult level of item general in
the medium category, the means is very good because it is not difficult and not easy. The conclusion item
analysis using rasch model in semester final exam evaluation were valid, reliable, and the difficulty level of
item is very good.

References

Andersen, E. B. (1973). A Goodness of Fit Test for the Rasch Model. Psychometrika,

(1), 123-140.

Arikunto, S. (2001). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

BNSP. (2009). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang

Standar Nasioan Pendidikan. Jakarta: BNSP.

Curtis, D. D. 2007. X-ray Your Data with Rasch. International Education Journal, 8(2),

-259.

Fisher, A. G. (1993). The Assessment of IADL Motor Skills: An Application of Manyfaceted

Rasch Analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(4), 319-

Ismail, I., Idrus, R. M., & Johari, S. S. M. (2010). Acceptance on Mobile Learning Via

SMS: a Rasch Model Analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile

Technologies (iJIM), 4(2), 10-16.

Mair, P., & Hatzinger, R. (2007). Extended Rasch Modeling: The eRm Package for the

Application of IRT Models in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(9), 1-20.

Rahayu, Dwi T., Purnomo H. B., & Sukidin. (2014). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya

Beda pada Soal Ujian Tengah Semester Ganjil Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Mata Pelajaran

Ekonomi Kelas X di SMA Negeri 5 Jember Tahun Ajaran 2012-2013. Jurnal

Edukasi UNEJ, 1(1).

Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar pada Tingkat Satuan

Pendidikan. Ambon: Unesa University Press.

Sari, D. R, Sekarwana, N., Hinduan, Z. R., & Sumintono, B. (2016). Analisis Tingkat

Kepuasan Masyarakat terhadap Dimensi Kualitas Pelayanan Tenaga Pelaksana

Eliminasi Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. JSK, 2(1), 47-55.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment

Pendidikan. Bandung: Trim Komunikata.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi. Bandung: AlfaBeta.

Tennant, A., McKenna, S. P., & Hagell, P. (2004). Application of Rasch Analysis in the

Development and Application of Quality of Life Instruments. Value in Health, 7,

S22-S26.

Widyaningsih, S. W., & Yusuf, I. (2018). Analisis Soal Modul Laboratorium Fisika

Sekolah I Menggunakan Racsh Model, Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan

Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(1).

Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam

Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS di Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Papua, Jurnal

Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 42-49.

Downloads

Published

09-06-2019

How to Cite

Palimbong, J., Mujasam, M., & Allo, A. Y. T. (2019). Item Analysis Using Rasch Model in Semester Final Exam Evaluation Study Subject in Physics Class X TKJ SMK Negeri 2 Manokwari. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 1(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v1i1.40

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): June 2018

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.