Application of Problem Posing Model for Achievement The Result of Physics Study at SMA Negeri 1 Taniwel

Authors

  • Amelia Niwele Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Biak
  • Beatus M Laka Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Biak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v1i1.35

Keywords:

problem posing, learning outcomes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the achievement of student learning outcomes using
problem posing model in SMA Negeri I Taniwel. This type of research was descriptive. Random sampling
technique was conducted to determine the sample of research that is class XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri I Taniwel.
Technique of data analysis in the form of analysis of student achievement test result based on reference
benchmark rating or reference standard. Formative test results (posttest) showed that most statements have
achieved higher scores, after getting treatment through the problem posing model applied. The results
showed that the problem posing model can help students in achieving good physics learning outcomes,
especially on business and energy concepts with a final value of 82.6.

References

Akay, H., & Boz, N. (2010). The Effect of Problem Posing Oriented Analyses-II Course

on the Attitudes Toward Mathematics and Mathematics Self-efficacy of Elementary

Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1),

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi aksara

Chang, K. E., Wu, L. J., Weng, S. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2012). Embedding Game-based

problem-solving Phase into Problem-posing System for Mathematics Learning.

Computers & Education, 58(2), 775-786.

Cankoy, O., & Darbaz, S. (2010). Effect of a Problem Posing based Problem Solving

Instruction on Understanding Problem. Hacettepe University Journal of Education,

, 11-24.

Hatmawati, R. S., Rokhmat, J., & Kosim. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem

Posing dengan Metode Eksperimen untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika pada

Peserta didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 19 Mataram Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016.

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(1), 23-29.

Nurliawaty, L., Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2017). Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik

(LKPD) Berbasis Problem Solving Polya. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1), 72-81.

Rahmad. M, Norhamidah, D., & Fakhruddin. (2009). Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta didik

Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing di Kelas X4 Man 1

Pekanbaru. Jurnal Geliga Sains, 3(2), 34-41.

Ratumanan, G. T. (2002). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Surabaya: University Press.

Riduwan. (2011). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sadirman, A. (2001). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo

Persada.

Sari, R. R. I., Zainuddin, & Abdul, M. S. (2017). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik

Melalui Metode Problem Posing dalam Setting Cooperative Learning pada

Pembelajaran Fisika di Kelas X 2 SMA Negeri 10 Banjarmasin. Jurnal Ilmiah

Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 104-112.

Suliyati, Mujasam, Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2018). Penerapan Model PBL

Menggunakan Alat Peraga Sederhana Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik.

Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 11-22.

Trianto. (2007). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik.

Prestasi, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Irawati, R. K. (2014). Pengaruh Model Problem Solving dan Problem Posing serta

Kemampuan Awal terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(4),

-192.

Wakhidah, N. (2007). Ilmu Alamiah Dasar. Prestasi Pustaka, Malang.

Wenno. I. H. (2011). Metodologi Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Konteks. Yogyakarta;

Grafika Indah.

Zakaria, E., & Ngah, N. (2011). A Preliminary Analysis of Students’ Problem-posing

Ability and its Relationship to Attitudes Towards Problem Solving. Research

Downloads

Published

09-06-2019

How to Cite

Niwele, A., & Laka, B. M. (2019). Application of Problem Posing Model for Achievement The Result of Physics Study at SMA Negeri 1 Taniwel. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v1i1.35

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): June 2018

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.