Analysis of The Effectiveness and Learning Activity of Students Through Online Physics Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v6i1.245Keywords:
Efektifitas, Keaktifan belajar, Physics LearningAbstract
This studed aims to analyze the effectiveness and activeness of students' learning through online physics learning during in the Covid-19 pandemic at SMA Negeri 2 Manokwari. The research method used is the survey method using a questionnaire. The sampling technique is using purposive sampling with a sample of 90 students. The instrument used is an effectiveness questionnaire as many as 16 statements and a learning activity questionnaire as many as 15 statements with data analysis techniques using the Rasch Model with the help of the Winstep application. The results of the analysis show that for the effectiveness of learning the Crombach Alpha value is 0.53, while using the Wright map the distribution of respondents generally gathers between logit SD (+0.00) to logit SD (+2.00) it means that many students are interested in taking physics lessons online and consider it good or effective. Meanwhile, for active learning, the value of Alpha Crombach is 0.64, also using Wright's map the distribution of respondents generally gathered between logit SD (+0.00) to logit SD (+8.00) and above logit SD (-0.80) this means that many students are active in participating in physics learning online and considers the level of active learning is high. This shows that online physics learning at SMA Negeri 2 Manokwari can be said to be good and the level of student activity is high.References
Ali, M. (2013). Penelitian Kependidikan Prosedur dan Strategi. Bandung: CV Angkasa.
Arikunto. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Praktek . Jakarta: Bina Aksara
Baroh, C. (2010). Efektivitas Metode Simulasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika pada Pokok Bahasan Peluang di Kelas IX-A MTs Nurul Huda Kalanganyar Sedati Sidoarjo. Skripsi Pendidikan Matematika.
Ema, A. & Ibrahim. (2017). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Fiqih dengan Menggunakan Metode Demonstrasi di Madrasah Ibtidayah Negeri Desa Penggagemuba. Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI, 101(1).
Karsidi, R. (2005). Sosiologi Pendidikan. Surakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan UNS dan UPT Penerbitan dan Percetakan UNS.
Lawshe. (1975). A Quantitativa to Content Validity. Personnell Psychology, 28(1). 563-575.
Masidjo. (1995). Penilaian Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Mudhofir. (1987). Teknologi Instruksional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
NRC (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC, USA: The National Academy of Science, National Academy Press.
Sardiman. (1988). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar: Pedoman Bagi Guru dan Calon Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sudarsana, I. K. (2016). Pemikiran tokoh pendidikan dalam buku Lifelong Learning: Policies, Practices, and Programs (Perspektif Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di Indonesia). Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 2(2), 44-53.
Sudjana, N. (1990). Teori-Teori Belajar untuk Pengajaran. Bandung: Fakultas Ekonomi UI.
Sudjana, N. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar, Sinar Baru Bandung.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumintono, B & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Tim Komunikata Publishing House.
Suryabrata. (1990). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajawali.
Talu, M. M., Kristanto, W. H., & Santhalia, P. W. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Fisika Daring di Era PAndemi Covid-19 Pada Sekolah yang Kesulitan Akses Internet (Studi Kasus Sekolah di Kabupaten Sumba Barat). Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 12(2), 196-202.
Trianto, (2009). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Surabaya: Kencana
Widoyoko. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Whatsapp 