Revealing the Overconfidence Misconception in Optics Material: Analysis of Consistency and Confidence Levels of Prospective Physics Teachers

Authors

  • Ramadhan Purbaya Universitas Mulawarman
  • Riskan Qadar Universitas Mulawarman
  • Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v9i1.1237

Abstract

Misconceptions in optics accompanied by high confidence levels remain a persistent concern, particularly among prospective physics teachers whose conceptual errors may be transferred to future students. This study aimed to analyze the conceptual consistency and confidence levels of Physics Education students in optics material using the Four-Tier Diagnostic Test (FTDT). A quantitative descriptive design was employed involving 37 Physics Education students from a university in East Kalimantan, selected through purposive sampling. The instrument consisted of 50 items covering five subtopics, plane mirrors, concave mirrors, convex mirrors, convex lenses, and concave lenses with a Cronbach's Alpha reliability of 0.865. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation tests applied to 1,850 item-level responses. Results showed that 68% of responses were categorized as Consistent Scientific, 22% as Consistent Misconception, and 10% as Inconsistent, with 87% falling under High Confidence. The concave mirror subtopic recorded the highest misconception rate (35%), with the majority accompanied by high confidence. The Spearman correlation revealed a significant but weak positive relationship between conceptual consistency and confidence level (r = 0.183; p < 0.01), indicating the presence of overconfidence misconception. These findings provide empirical support that FTDT can serve as one alternative diagnostic instrument for simultaneously identifying students' conceptual consistency and confidence levels in optics material.

References

Azwar, S. (2021). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Budiyono, A., Mulyadi, S. A., Wildani, A., Pertiwi, N. A. S., & Alatas, F. (2025). Mapping the Evolution of Tiered Diagnostic Instruments for Identifying Students’ Misconceptions in Physics: A Systematic Review of Indonesian Research (2015–2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17879

Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do Students Know What They Know and What They Don’t Know? Using a Four-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess the Nature of Students’ Alternative Conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4

Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and Application of a Three‐Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130

Çelikkanlı, N. Ö., & Kızılcık, H. Ş. (2022). A Review of Studies About Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests in Physics Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1291–1311. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.175

Ceuppens, S., Deprez, J., Dehaene, W., & De Cock, M. (2018). Tackling Misconceptions in Geometrical Optics. Physics Education, 53(4), 045020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aac604

Desstya, A., Sayekti, I. C., Abduh, M., & Sukartono, S. (2025). Development of A Four-Tier Diagnostic Test for Misconceptions in Natural Science of Primary School Pupils. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 22(2), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.017

Fenditasari, K., Jumadi, Istiyono, E., & Hendra. (2020). Identification of Misconceptions on Heat and Temperature Among Physics Education Students Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012055

Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to Measure Metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill Education.

Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners’ Knowledge in Optics: Interpretation, Structure and Analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900290000

Goldberg, F. M., & McDermott, L. C. (1987). An Investigation of Student Understanding of The Real Image Formed by A Converging Lens or Concave Mirror. American Journal of Physics, 55(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15254

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Handayani, S. L., Rukmana, D. (2018). Perbandingan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pgsd Uhamka Materi Optik Geometri. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 44–56. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/2727

Hayati, N., Junus, M., Riskan Qadar, (2021). Studi Analisis Hubungan Self-Efficacy Dengan Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 2(1), 83–91. http://jurnal.fkip.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JLPF

Kaltakci-Gurel, D. (2023). Exploring Pre-Service Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding and Confidence in Geometrical Optics: A Focus on Gender and Prior Course Achievement. Education Sciences, 13(5), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050452

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2016). Identifying Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions and Conceptual Difficulties About Geometrical Optics. European Journal of Physics, 37(4), 045705. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/4/045705

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and Application of A Four-Tier Test to Assess Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions About Geometrical Optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094

Kaniawati, I., Maulidina, W. N., Novia, H., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., Aminudin, A. H., & Suhendi, E. (2021). Implementation of Interactive Conceptual Instruction (ICI) Learning Model Assisted by Computer Simulation: Impact of Students’ Conceptual Changes on Force and Vibration. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(22), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i22.25465

Lichtenberger, A., Hofer, S. I., Stern, E., & Vaterlaus, A. (2025). Enhanced Conceptual Understanding Through Formative Assessment: Results of a Randomized Controlled Intervention Study in Physics Classes. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 37(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-024-09445-6

Ma, H., Yang, H., Li, C., Ma, S., & Li, G. (2025). The Effectiveness and Sustainability of Tier Diagnostic Technologies for Misconception Detection in Science Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 17(7), 3145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073145

Makhrus, M., Widodo, W., & Agustini, R. (2018). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran CCM-CCA untuk Memfasilitasi Perubahan Konsep Gaya pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 4(2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i2.810

Morphew, J. W. (2021). Changes in Metacognitive Monitoring Accuracy in an Introductory Physics Course. Metacognition and Learning, 16(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09239-3

Ozdemir, E., Coramik, M., & Urek, H. (2020). Determination of Conceptual Understanding Levels Related to Optics Concepts: The Case of Opticianry. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, 8(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v8i1.728

Pacaci, C., Ustun, U., & Ozdemir, O. F. (2024). Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Strategies in Science Education: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(6), 1263–1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21887

Palacios, F. J. P., Cazorla, F. N., & Madrid, A. C. (1989). Misconceptions on Geometric Optics and Their Association With Relevant Educational Variables. International Journal of Science Education, 11(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110304

Pasaribu, M., Nurjannah, N., & Miftah, M. (2023). Misconception Level Analysis of Prospective Physics Teacher Students in Geometric Optic Using Multiple-Misconception Revealing Test. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(7), 702–720. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.70755

Pratama, D. (2025). A Reduction in Undergraduate Misconceptions on AC Circuits through Interactive Simulations. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 8(1), 272–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v8i1.947

Qadar, R., Haryanto, Z., Subagiyo, L., Junus, M., & Syam, M. (2022). Indonesian Science Teachers’ Ability to Design Scientific Literacy Test. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 2(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v2i1.52

Resbiantoro, G., Setiani, R., & Dwikoranto. (2022). A Review of Misconception in Physics: The Diagnosis, Causes, and Remediation. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.128

Sholikah, A., Febriyanti, D. S., & Kurniawan, B. R. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika Menggunakan Quizziz Pada Pokok Bahasan Optika Geometri. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 11(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v11i1.4152

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suhandi, A., Samsudin, A., Fratiwi, N. J., Nurdini, N., Feranie, S., Purwanto, M. G., Linuwih, S., & Coştu, B. (2025). Altering Misconceptions: How E-Rebuttal Texts on Newton’s Laws Reconstructs Students’ Mental Models. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1472385

Sukariasih, L., Yuris, M. (2024). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI pada Konsep Fluida Statis dengan Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test di SMA Negeri 2 Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.36709/jipfi.v9i3.131

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 37–76). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Taqwa, M. R. A., Hidayat, A., Sutopo, S. (2017). Konsistensi Pemahaman Konsep Kecepatan dalam Berbagai Representasi. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.12928/Jrkpf.V4i1.6469

Utama, R., Mustava, O., Toifur, M., & Farah Dina, D. (2025). Exploring Misconceptions of Light and Shadow Formation among Senior High School Students: A Qualitative Study in Physics Education. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 8(2), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v8i2.1028

Wati, E., Samsudin, A., Saepuzaman, D., & Sozbilir, M. (2025). Trend of Applying the Conceptual Change Model in Physics Learning: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 14(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v14i1.26130

Yuberti, Y., Suryani, Y., & Kurniawati, I. (2020). Four-Tier Diagnostic Test with Certainty of Response Index to Identify Misconception in Physics. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6061

Downloads

Published

10-06-2026

How to Cite

Purbaya, R., Qadar, R., & Zulkarnaen, Z. (2026). Revealing the Overconfidence Misconception in Optics Material: Analysis of Consistency and Confidence Levels of Prospective Physics Teachers. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 9(1), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v9i1.1237

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): June 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Universitas Papua

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.