The Learning Revolution: Investigating the Use of Technology to Explore Mathematical Physics Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v7i1.523Keywords:
Mathematical physics, phenomenon physics, pre-service physics teacher, technologyAbstract
This research aims to describe how future physics teachers study mathematical physics. Physics students must master the existing material in Mathematical Physics mathematics well, thoroughly, and collaboratively. Data collection is done with lifts, interviews, and observations. Research results show that the learning process needs to be more contextual, less applicative, and highly dominant in mathematics; less attractive teaching materials and lectures are not designed to equip students with the skills of the 21st century. Learning does not use technology to help students solve physical problems. It causes students difficulty learning mathematical methods in physics. In fact, in learning mathematical physics, students must master the concepts related to mathematics tools and their applications. The ability to mathematically solve problems of physical phenomena and give meaning to mathematical models is built into critical aspects of learning. The solution that can be applied is to apply technology using software applications like Maple.References
Branchetti, L., Cattabriga, A., & Levrini, O. (2019). Interplay Between Mathematics and Physics to Catch the Nature of A Scientific Breakthrough: the Case of the Blackbody. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 20130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020130
Costa, A. L. (1991). Developing Minds. In Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thiinking (Revised, V). ASCD Publications.
Dachraoui, S., Bentaleb, K. A., Hassouni, T., Ibrahmi, E. M. A., & Taqi, A. (2023). Interaction Between Physical Sciences And Mathematics-Case of Differential. International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering, 14(2), 167–175.
Dewey, J. (1993). How We Think A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Heath & Co Publishers.
Eynde, S., Goedhart, M., Deprez, J., & De Cock, M. (2023). Role of Graphs in Blending Physical and Mathematical Meaning of Partial Derivatives in the Context of the Heat Equation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10237-3
Guisasola, J., & Zuza, K. (2020). Challenges in Physics Education. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Hill, M., & Sharma, M. D. (2015). Students’ Representational Fluency at University: A Cross- Sectional Measure of How Multiple Representations are Used by Physics Students Using the Representational Fluency Survey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1633–1655. http://physics.usyd.edu.au
Journal, C., & West, B. H. (2018). Teaching Differential Equations without Computer Graphics Solutions is a Crime Graphics Solutions is a Crime . CODEE Journal, 11(1), 27–46.
Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Walker, A. E. (2018). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for Stem Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1
Kjeldsen, T. H., & Lützen, J. (2015). Interactions Between Mathematics and Physics: The History of the Concept of Function-Teaching with and About Nature of Mathematics. Science and Education, 24(5), 543–559.
Kneubil, F. B., & Robilotta, M. R. (2015). Physics Teaching: Mathematics as an Epistemological. Science & Education, 24(2), 645–660. http://10.0.3.239/s11191-014-9727-5
Kuo, E., Hallinen, N. R., & Conlin, L. D. (2017). When Procedures Discourage Insight: Epistemological Consequences of Prompting Novice Physics Students to Construct Force Diagrams. International Journal of Science Education, 0693(April), 1–26. www.tandfonline.com/loi/tsed20
Liu, Y., Shen, F., & Yang, Y. (2019). Numerical Simulation on the Propagation and Deflection of Fast Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) Interacting with a Corotating Interaction Region in Interplanetary Space. The Astrophysical Journal, 887(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab543e
Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2016). Using Categorization of Problems as an Instructional Tool to Help Introductory Students Learn Physics. Physics Education, 51 (025009, 1–5. http://iopscience.org/ped
Meitasari, D., & Wiyono, K. (2024). Identification of Physics Concepts in Tanjung Batu Knock Down House Identifikasi Konsep Fisika pada Rumah Knock Down Tanjung Batu. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 7(1), 44–54.
Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2023). Differential Equations: Students’ Reasoning About A Problem Posing Task. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2162454
Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. (2005). Frameworks for Thinking: A Handbook for Teaching and Learning (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru,UK. www.cambridge.org/9780521848312%0A©
Muhammad, N., Taib, S., Misbah, M., Yani, M., & Purwasih, D. (2023). Electronic Module Renewable Energy (E-MET): Validity and Practicality Aspect. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 5(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v5i2.372
Palmgren, E., & Rasa, T. (2022). Modelling Roles of Mathematics in Physics: Perspectives for Physics Education. Science and Education, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00393-5
Ramadhani, F. D., Wati, M., & Wiyono, K. (2021). The Validity of Electronic Learning Materials Optical Instruments Based on Authentic Learning to Train Students’ Problem Solving Skills. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 4(2), 78–89.
Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R. E., Goodhew, L. M., Daane, A. R., Gray, K. E., & Aker, L. B. (2017). Identifying Content Knowledge for Teaching Energy: Examples from High School Physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 1–14. 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010105
Salehi, K., Azeez, W. A., & Shamdeen, S. M. H. (2022). Mathematical and Numerical Computation with Maple. In Lambert Academic Publishing. KS Omniscriptum Publishing.
Sujito, S., Liliasari, L., Suhandi, A., & Soewono, E. (2021a). Investigating and Developing The Ability to Model Physics Phenomena. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(4), 3283–3294. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/V16Issue4.htm
Sujito, S., Pratiwi, H. Y., Soewono, E., Suhandi, A., & Liliasari, S. (2021). Views and Practices of Mathematical Method for Physics Lecture at Pre-Service Physics Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(12), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012001
Sujito, S., & Liliasari, L. (2021). Differential equations: Solving the Oscillation System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012163
Sujito, S., Liliasari, L., Suhandi, A., & Soewono, E. (2021b). Description in Course of Mathematical Methods for Physics and Possible Development of Course Program. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i1.5184
Sujito, S., Wisodo, H., Pratiwi, H. Y., Setyahadi, B., Soewono, E., Suhandi, A., & Liliasari, L. (2021). Applying Differential Equations for Study Magnetohydrodynamic Phenomenon on the Solar Surface. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012203
Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple Representations in Physics Education. Springer International Publishing AG.
Utesov, A. B., & Bazarkhanova, A. A. (2022). Optimal Computing Units in the Problem of Discretizing Solutions of the Klein–Gordon Equation and Their Limit Errors. Differential Equations, 58(5), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012266122050093
Williams, M. (2018). The Missing Curriculum in Physics Problem-Solving Education. Science & Education, 27(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9970-2 Article
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.