Exploring Misconceptions of Light and Shadow Formation among Senior High School Students: A Qualitative Study in Physics Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v8i2.1028Abstract
This study explores senior high school students’ misconceptions of light and shadow formation within the context of physics education. Despite being a fundamental concept in optics, many students continue to experience difficulties in understanding the principles of light propagation, the rectilinear nature of light, and the conditions required for shadow formation. This research employed a qualitative exploratory design involving 32 students from Grade X and XI science classes in Central Java, Indonesia. Data were collected through diagnostic tests and semi-structured interviews, which allowed in-depth identification of alternative conceptions. The analysis revealed three dominant categories of misconceptions: (1) perceiving light as a substance that “flows” from the source, (2) assuming that shadows are independent objects rather than regions of blocked light, and (3) misunderstanding the relationship between light intensity, distance, and shadow clarity. These findings confirm that students often rely on intuitive reasoning based on everyday experiences rather than scientific explanations. The discussion highlights the implications for physics instruction, particularly the need for teaching strategies that incorporate conceptual change models and inquiry-based learning to address students’ alternative frameworks. The study concludes that addressing misconceptions in optics requires not only emphasizing correct scientific principles but also engaging students in reflective and interactive learning processes that directly confront their prior conceptions.
References
Anawati, R. Y., Mujasam, M., Widyaningsih, S. W., & Yusuf, I. (2020). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Berbasis Alat Peraga Sederhana Fisika Materi Usaha dan Energi terhadap Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(3), 119-128. https://dx.doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2020.v5i3.4446
Bhakti, Y. B., Wibowo, T., & Sihaloho, R. (2023). Four-tier Optics Diagnostic Test (4T-ODT) to Identify Misconceptions. Proceedings of ICETECH 2022.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE Publications.
Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental-Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.). International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, 61–82. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874813-9
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Hecht, E. (2017). Optics (5th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and Application of a Four-Tier Test to Assess Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions about Geometrical Optics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094
Kunaedi, J., Samsudin, A., Hasanah, L., Hidiana Aminudin, A., Herliyana Dewi, F., Alfionita Umar, F., Rona Wahyu Astuti, I., & Nurul Mufida, S. (2024). Developing Diagnostic Test on Geometrical Optics (DT-GO) Concept. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15637
Métioui, A. (2023). Primary School Preservice Teachers’ Alternative Conceptions about Light Interaction with Matter (Reflection, Refraction, and Absorption) and Shadow Size Changes on Earth and Sun. Education Sciences, 13(5), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050462
Mufit, F., Festiyed, Ahmad, F., & Lufri. (2023). The Effect of Cognitive Conflict-Based Learning on Students’ Understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16319a
Mustofa, A., Supriyono, & Wijaya, A. (2023). Development of a Five-Tier Diagnostic Test for Geometrical Optics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2601(1), 012034.
Nasir, M., Cari, Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2024). The Development of a two-tier diagnostic test for student understanding of light. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(1), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.009
Negoro, R. A., & Karina, V. (2019). Development of a Four-Tier Diagnostic Test for Misconception of Oscillation and Waves. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05201
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
Pratama, D. (2025). A Reduction in Undergraduate Misconceptions on AC Circuits through Interactive Simulations. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 8(1), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v8i1.947
Putri, R. A. H., Widodo, A., & Rusyati, L. (2024). Diagnosis of Students’ Conception on Light and Optic Topics with Four-Tier Test (pp. 177–190). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-283-5_18
Rapi, N. K., Suastra, I. W., Widiarini, P., & Widiana, I. W. (2022). The Influence of Flipped Classroom-Based Project Assessment on Concept Understanding and Critical Thinking Skills in Physics Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.38275
Rismawati, R., Sinon, I. L., Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing (guided inquiry) terhadap keterampilan proses sains peserta didik di SMK Negeri 02 Manokwari. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v8i1.267
Salmadhia, F., Rusnayati, H., & Liliawati, W. (2021). Five-Tier Geometrical Optics Test Feasibility to Identify Misconception and The Causes in High School Students. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i2.8874
Sapriati, A., Rahayu, U., Sausan, I., Sekarwinahyu, M., & Anam, R. S. (2024). The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking in Biology Education Programs within Open and Distance Learning Systems. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/7sty9026
Schroeder, N. L., & Kucera, A. C. (2022). Refutation Text Facilitates Learning: a Meta-Analysis of Between-Subjects Experiments. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 957–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09656-z
Soeharto, S., & Csapó, B. (2022). Exploring Indonesian Student Misconceptions in Science Concepts. Heliyon, 8(9), e10720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10720
Sujarwanto, E., & Abdurrahman, A. (2021). Students’ Alternative Conceptions about Light and Vision. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14119a
Syahrul, A., Hasanah, R., & Ningsih, D. (2020). Misconceptions about Light and Shadow among Pre-Service Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 6(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.1834
Tipler, P. A., & Mosca, G. (2019). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (7th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
Widiyatmoko, A., Sari, L., & Pratiwi, H. (2021). The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle with Cognitive Conflict on Conceptual Understanding. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.29642
Yusnia, E., Suyanto, S., & Pramesti, D. (2020). Development and Validation of a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test on Light Concept using IRT. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i1.15769
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Universitas Papua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Whatsapp 
