Examining How Junior High School Students Understand on Vibration and Wave Topics in HOTS Questions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v7i2.807Abstract
This study offers fresh perspectives on the difficulties students encounter when grasping concepts related to vibrations and waves. It highlights the need for creating more effective Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) questions to enhance student comprehension.This research aims to examining the understanding of junior high school students about vibrations and waves regarding HOTS questions. The method used in this study is descriptive analysis in which 68 students of 9th grade junior high school participated and answered five multiple-choice HOTS questions about vibration and waves topic. The reliability of the questions used in this study was 0.845, indicating a high level of reliability. The results of the study showed that overall, 66% of students understand the concept of vibrations and wave, but 21% of students were categorized as very less at understanding HOTS questions related to vibration and waves well. In addition, students’ ability in understanding question with indicator C6 was also the lowest when compared to indicator C5 and C4. It was concluded that a wide deficit exists among them regarding the higher conceptual knowledge of physics. Such findings could be a starting point for making necessary adjustments in curriculum and teaching methodology at junior high school physics.
References
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Ariani, T. (2020). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Physics Problems. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v3i1.119
Astuti, N. H., Rusilowati, A., Subali, B., & Marwoto, P. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Model Polya Materi Getaran, Gelombang, dan Bunyi Siswa SMP. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v9i1.38274
Chandio, M. T., Pandhiani, S. M., & Iqbal, S. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy: Improving Assessment and Teaching-Learning Process. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 3(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1034
Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., Mason, A., Ryan, Q. X., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing Student Written Problem Solutions: A Problem-Solving Rubric with Application to Introductory Physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130
Drigas, A., & Kontopoulou, M.-T. L. (2016). ICTs based Physics Learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 6(3), 53. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v6i3.5899
Fitriani, R., Maison, Asrial, Purwaningsih, S., & Asma, R. (2023). Diagnosing Students’ Conception of Wave Propagation Using the Five-Tier Isomorphic Instrument. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9461–9473. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5413
Furqani, D., Feranie, S., & Winarno, N. (2018). The Effect of Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Strategy on Students’ Conceptual Mastery and Critical Thinking in Learning Vibration and Wave. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i1.12879
Ginting, A. B., & Siregar, N. (2022). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions on Vibration and Wave Material by Using the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal Scientia Indonesia, 8(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v8i2.39867
Handayanto, S. K., Fawaiz, S., & Taufiq, A. (2024). Using E-Scaffolding To Develop Students’ Scientific Reasoning Through Inquiry-Based Learning. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 26(3), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-3082
Handayanto, S. K., Kusairi, S., & Muhardjito. (2015). The Effects of Scaffoldings in Cooperative Learning on Physics Achievement Among Senior High School Students. International Seminar Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education, 69–73.
Kanyesigye, S. T., Uwamahoro, J., & Kemeza, I. (2022). Difficulties in Understanding Mechanical Waves: Remediated by Problem-based Instruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 10140. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010140
Koes-H, S., Pradana, S. D. S., & Suwasono, P. (2020). Integration Conceptual Scaffolding in The Group Investigation : Its Influence on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (The 2nd International Conference on Reasearch and Learning of Physics), 1481(012132), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012132
Koriah, E. N., & Jumini, S. (2024). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Getaran dan Gelombang Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Three-Tier Multiple Choice di SMPN 3 Watumalang. Biochepy: Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 466–475. https://doi.org/10.52562/biochephy.v4i1.1193
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom ’ s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–219. The Ohio State University
Mamun, M. A. Al, & Lawrie, G. (2023). Cognitive Presence in Learner–Content Interaction Process: The Role of Scaffolding in Online Self-Regulated Learning Environments. In Journal of Computers in Education (Issue 0123456789). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00279-7
Mawaddah, A. H. (2023). Profile of Junior High School Students’ Understanding of Vibration, Waves, and Light. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i2.292
Meilina, I. L., Handayanto, S. K., & Muhardjito, M. (2020). Modelling Instruction Effect with Different Reasoning Ability on Physics Conceptual Understanding by Controlling the Prior Knowledge. In Momentum: Physics Education Journal (pp. 73–84). University of Kanjuruhan Malang. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v4i2.4522
Nisfah, N. L., Purwaningsih, E., & Parno, P. (2022). Collaborative Inquiry Integrated Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge to Improve Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 6(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v6i1.36440
Nurhatmanti, R., Lian, B., & Dedy, A. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) in Natural Science Subjects Class V Elementary School. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 208–213.
Nurhayati, Wahyudi, & Hakim, S. L. (2021). Development of HOTS Assesment Instrument in Vibration ad Wave Course. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpf.v9.n1.202108
Pane, A. N., Andra, D., & Wayan Distrik, I. (2021). The Development Physics E-Module based PBL-Integrated STEM to Improve Higher-Order Thinking Skills on Static Fluid Material. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012086
Rashid, A. H. A., Shukor, N. A., & Tasir, Z. (2017). Using Peer Scaffolding to Enhance Students’ Reasoning Skills in Online Collaborative Learning. IEEE Conference on E-Learning, e-Management and e-Services, IC3e 2016, 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2016.8009036
Rezeki, N. S., Purba, A. A., & Simangunsong, I. T. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Physics Literacy Skills in Solving HOTS Problems and Self-Regulated Learning. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 7(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v7i1.488
Rosa, F. O., & Widiawati, T. (2022). Analysis of the Difficulty of Understanding the Concepts of Vibration and Waves of Students Junior High School. International Journal of Research and Review, 9(12), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20221279
Sari, D. N., Arif, K., Yurnetti, Y., & Putri, A. N. (2024). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions in Junior High Schools Accredited A using the Three Tier Test Instrument in Science Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.5064
Sobirin, M., H, S. K. ., & & Kusairi, S. (2019). Distributed Scaffolding Influences in Inquiry Learning on High Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(4), 128–134. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jps/article/view/11806
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Blooms Taxonomy Revised - Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. In A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://quincycollege.edu/wp-content/uploads/Anderson-and-Krathwohl_Revised-Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf
Wiyantara, A., Widodo, A., & Prima, E. C. (2021). Identify Students’ Conception and Level of Representations Using Five-tier Test on Wave Concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012137
Yana, A. U., Antasari, L., & Kurniawan, B. R. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Gelombang Mekanik Melalui Aplikasi Online Quizizz. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 7(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v7i2.14284
Yana, A. U., Handayanto, S. K., Taufiq, A., Fawaiz, S., Rizal, F., & Rohmawati, W. (2023). Can E-Scaffolding Influence the Shift in the Level of Scientific Reasoning in Physics Learning? International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, Proceeding, 53–63.
Yulianti, E., Al Husna, I. Y., & Susilowati, S. (2018). The Role of Inquiry-Based Interactive Demonstration Learning Model on VIII Grade Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill. Journal of Science Education Research, 2(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v2i1.19333
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Universitas Papua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.