Bontang City Physics Teachers' Understanding of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Cognitive and Knowledge Dimensions in Physics Questions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v7i2.559Keywords:
Bloom's Taxonomy, Cognitive Dimension, Knowledge Dimension, Teacher's UnderstandingAbstract
This study aims to determine the teacher's understanding of physics questions in revised Bloom taxonomy on optics. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research using survey method. The population of this study were Physics Subject Teachers in Bontang City. Sampling technique carried out using purposive sampling technique with criteria of teachers who teach Physics subjects for junior and senior high school. Data collection techniques were carried out using test and analyzed based on predetermined categories. The results obtained are the understanding of cognitive dimension of teacher is in the medium category with details of very high category 0%, high category 10%, medium category 47%, low category 30%, and very low category 13%. While in knowledge dimension, teachers' understanding is in the moderate category with details of very high category 3%, high category 7%, medium category 33%, low category 50%, and very low category 7%.
References
Aflah, N. S., & Sunarti, T. (2022). Analisis Soal Fisika Berbasis High Order Thinking Skill dalam Penilaian Akhir Tahun di SMA. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.573-579
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Barari, N., RezaeiZadeh, M., Khorasani, A., & Alami, F. (2022). Designing and Validating Educational Standards for E-teaching in Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs), Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1640–1652. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1739078
Boeren, E., & Íñiguez-Berrozpe, T. (2022). Unpacking PIAAC’s cognitive skills measurements through engagement with Bloom’s taxonomy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73, 101151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101151
Dam, M., Majumder, D., Bhattacharjee, R., & Santra, S. S. (2022). Student’s Performance Evaluation According to The Cognitive Domain: Fuzzy Logic Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2286(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2286/1/012014
Damanik, F. C., & Irfandi. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24114/inpafi.v10i1.33117
Erniyanti, Junus, M., & Syam, M. (2020). Analisis Ranah Kognitif Soal Latihan Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi pada Buku Fisika Kelas X (Studi pada Buku Karya Ni Ketut Lasmi). Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 1(02), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v1i02.337
Farhan, M. S., & Zanthy, L. S. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Matematika Siswa MA Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Menggunakan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 2(5), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v2i5.p307-314
Febrilia, B. R. A. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Guru dalam Merancang Soal/Permasalahan Matematika Ditinjau dari Taksonomi Bloom. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 4(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v4i2.859
Gul, R., Kanwal, S., & Khan, S. S. (2020). Preferences of the Teachers in Employing Revised Blooms Taxonomy in their Instructions. Sjesr, 3(2), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss2-2020(258-266)
Harta, J., Rasuh, N. T., & Seriang, A. (2020). Using HOTS-Based Chemistry National Exam Questions to Map the Analytical Abilities of Senior High School Students. Journal of Science Learning, 3(3), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i3.22387
Koli, M. M. U., Pasaribu, R., & Dewa, E. (2023). Analisis Pengetahuan Kognitif Berdasarkan Dimensi Pengetahuan Materi Tekanan Zat Pada Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMPS Katolik Mater Inviolata. MAGNETON: Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika UNWIRA, 1(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.30822/magneton.v1i1.2045
Kosash, Asmawati, L., & Suhendar. (2022). Pengembangan Penliaian Materi IPA SMP Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 9(2), 36–48. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/JTPPm/article/view/17894
Lubis, V. S., Zulkarnaen, Z., & Junus, M. (2021). Pemetaan Dimensi Proses Kognitif dan Dimensi Pengetahuan Soal-Soal Evaluasi Materi Gelombang Cahaya dalam Tabel Taksonomi. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 2(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v2i2.577
Marisda, D. H., Handayani, Y., Dhiqfaini Sultan, A., Hasin, A., & Nur Samsi, A. (2022). Development Assessment of Thinking Skills Interpretation, Analysis, and Inference Prospective Physics Teacher. Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/.org/10.37891/kpej.v5i1.247
Momen, A., Ebrahimi, M., & Hassan, A. M. (2023). Importance and Implications of Theory of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Different Fields of Education (pp. 515–525). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20429-6_47
Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate The Cognitive Levels of Primary Leaving English Exam Questions in Rwandan schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00156-2
Mulyani, S. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Pemecahan Masalah pada Materi Perbandingan berdasarkan Ranah Kognitif Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. Syntax Idea, 2(3), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-idea.v2i3.160
Nilah, N., & Roza, L. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis dan Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Pada Topik Usaha dan Energi. IX, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.snf2020.02.pf.12
Paxinou, E., Georgiou, M., Kakkos, V., Kalles, D., & Galani, L. (2022). Achieving Educational Goals in Microscopy Education by Adopting Virtual Reality Labs on Top of Face-to-face Tutorials. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(3), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1790513
Pikhart, M., & Klimova, B. (2019). Utilization of Linguistic Aspects of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Blended Learning. Education Sciences, 9(3), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030235
Purnawati, L., & Nusantara, T. (2020). Analisis Pertanyaan Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Statistika Berdasarkan Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v11i2.5978
Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2019). Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Major Theories and Frameworks That Influence The Teaching, Learning, and Assessment of Mathematics: A Comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(6), 895–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1549336
Sagala, P. N., & Andriani, A. (2019). Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions of Probability Theory Subject Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025
Setyaningrum, T. A., Alfiah, A., & Sulanjari, B. (2020). Kemampuan Menyusun Soal Berbasis HOTS Guru Bahasa Jawa SMK Negeri Se-Kabupaten Kendal. Piwulang : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jawa, 8(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.15294/piwulang.v8i2.42641
Syarifah, L. L., Yenni, Y., & Dewi, W. K. (2020). Analisis Soal-Soal Pada Buku Ajar Matematika Siswa Kelas XI Ditinjau Dari Aspek Kognitif. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 1259–1272. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.335
Tambunan, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students’ Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715
Tyas, E. H., & Naibaho, L. (2021). HOTS Learning Model Improves the Quality of Education. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(1), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i1.2021.3100
Virranmäki, E., Valta-Hulkkonen, K., & Pellikka, A. (2020). Geography Tests in The Finnish Matriculation Examination in Paper and digital forms – An Analysis of Questions based on Revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100896
Wahyuni, A. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aritmatika Sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v11i1.10022
Wei, B., & Ou, Y. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Junior High School Science Curriculum Standards in Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao: Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(8), 1459–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9935-6
Widiana, I. W. (2020). The Effect of Digital Literacy on the Ability of Teachers to Develop HOTS-based Assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1503(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012045
Winarti, W., Hairida, H., & Lestari, I. (2021). Deskripsi Kemampuan Guru Membuat Soal Berdasarkan Pada Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Menengah Atas Kabupaten Landak. Jurnal.Unibrah.Ac.Id, 7(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4659018
Yusrizal, Halim, A., & Saminan. (2019). Pengetahuan dan Pemahaman Guru Fisika SMA Negeri Provinsi Aceh Dalam Penyusunan Soal Berbasis Taksonomi Bloom Revisi (Vol. 2019, Issue 08 Februari 2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356376512_Laporan_Akhir_Penelitian_Hibah_Profesor_2019_Anggota
Zorluoglu, S. L., Kizilaslan, A., & Donmez Yapucuoglu, M. (2020). The Analysis of 9th Grade Chemistry Curriculum and Textbook According to Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i1.3516
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Universitas Papua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Kasuari: Physics Education Journal Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/kpef/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Kasuari: Physics Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Contact