Why is the mathematics educator called inspiring?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v5i2.334

Keywords:

Constructivist Grounded Theory, Learning Motivation, Mathematics Educator Profile, Mathematics Identity, Pedagogy for Inspiration, Pedagogy of Inspiration, Prospective Mathematics Teacher

Abstract

Inspiration plays a significant role in sparking or enhancing the learning motivation of prospective mathematics teachers (PMTs). Inspiration will also influence the mathematical identity of PMTs’ when they become professional mathematics teachers. A mathematics teacher educator (MTE) can be a source of inspiration for PMTs; hence, a study must identify and explain why an MTE is considered inspiring. This study attempts to develop the theory of inspiring MTEs profiles based on the experience of PMTs. This study included 21 students and 7 lecturers of the Mathematics Education Department in a public university in Indonesia. This qualitative research was conducted employing a grounded theory constructivist approach. The findings revealed that inspiring MTEs possessed the following characteristics: “creating a sense of comfort, being knowledgeable, being motivating, providing fun and enjoyable learning, imparting new insights and comprehension, and being disciplined and authoritative.†According to this theory, an inspiring MTE creates a sense of comfort through their gracious, friendly, humble, and humorous personality. Fun and enjoyable learning in this study is learning that provide a sense of comfort, fun learning, interactive learning, and carrying out evaluations. MTEs give new insight and understanding by explaining in detail, systematically, and easily understood, sharing creative ideas, and providing scaffolding. Implications of this finding are discussed.

References

Baier, F., Decker, A. T., Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Kunter, M. (2019). What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers’ cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12256

Barnett, R. (2007). A Will to Learn: Being a Student in an age of Uncertainty. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Booth, R. D. L., & Thomas, M. O. J. (1999). Visualization in mathematics learning: Arithmetic problem-solving and student difficulties. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00027-9

Bradley, S., Kirby, E., & Madriaga, M. (2015). What students value as inspirational and transformative teaching. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.880363

Case, J., & Speer, N. (2021). Calculus Students’ Deductive Reasoning and Strategies when Working with Abstract Propositions and Calculus Theorems. Primus, 31(2), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1660931

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

Charmaz, K. (2017). Constructivist grounded theory. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 299–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262612

Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357

Cornejo-Araya, C. A., & Kronborg, L. (2021). Inspirational Teachers’ Model: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study in Gifted Education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(3), 300–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211023595

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (international student edition): Choosing among five approaches.

Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Deemer, E. D., Derosa, P. A., Duhon, S. A., & Dotterer, A. M. (2021). Psychological Momentum and Inertia: Toward a Model of Academic Motivation. Journal of Career Development, 48(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319848847

Derounian, J. G. (2017). Inspirational teaching in higher education: What does it look, sound and feel like? International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110109

Dewi, N. R. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui Scaffolding Berdasarkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. 6(2), 262–275.

George, M. (2012). Autonomy and Motivation in Remedial Mathematics. Primus, 22(4), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2010.497958

Hodges, T. E., & Hodge, L. L. (2017). Unpacking personal identities for teaching mathematics within the context of prospective teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9339-2

Jehadus, E., Tamur, M., Chen, J., & Perbowo, K. S. (2022). The influence of tutoring and learning motivation on mathematics achievement of junior high school students. Journal of Honai Math, 5(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v5i1.206

Kaasila, R. (2007). Using narrative inquiry for investigating the becoming of a mathematics teacher. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0023-6

Kamii, C., & Russell, K. A. (2012). Elapsed time: Why is it so difficult to teach? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0296

Ketterman, A. B., & Maner, J. K. (2021). Complaisant or coercive? The role of dominance and prestige in social influence. Personality and Individual Differences, 177(February), 110814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110814

Lamb, M., & Wedell, M. (2013). Inspiring English teachers: a comparative study of learner perceptions of inspirational teaching. ELT Research Papers, January, 7.

Lange, T. (2009). Difficulties , Meaning and Marginalisation in Mathematics Learning as Seen Through Children ‘ s Eyes Troels Lange. In Learning.

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given†in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9

Lickona, T. (1999). Character Education: Seven Crucial Issues. Action in Teacher Education, 20(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1999.10462937

Lukman, Marsigit, Istiyono, E., Kartowagiran, B., Retnawati, H., Kistoro, H. C. A., & Putranta, H. (2021). Effective teachers’ personality in strengthening character education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 512–521. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21629

Lutovac, S., & Kaasila, R. (2021). Towards conceptualising failure in mathematics as an autobiographical experience. European Journal of Teacher Education, 00(00), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1892070

Marschall, G., & Watson, S. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy as an aspect of narrative self-schemata. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103568

Noviantari, I. (2022). Matriculation: A Program to Increase the Initial Ability of Mathematics Education Student. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovation in Education and Pedagogy (ICIEP 2020), 619(Iciep 2020), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211219.016

Oleynick, V. C., Thrash, T. M., LeFew, M. C., Moldovan, E. G., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(JUNE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00436

Op ‘t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., GLASER, B., STRAUSS, A., Edgington, E. S., Charmaz, K., Lange, T., Derounian, J. G., Tambychik, T., Meerah, T. S. M., Corbin, J. M., STRAUSS, A., Mills, J., Bonner, A., Francis, K., Charmaz, K., Asigigan, S. I., Samur, Y., … Schallert, S. (2021). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 98(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1157

Pellikka, A., Lutovac, S., & Kaasila, R. (2022). The change in pre-service primary teachers’ possible selves in relation to science teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1803270

Popa, R. I. (2012). An experimental perspective over personality and leadership styles inside Romanian organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 488–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.169

Simamora, R. E. (2021). Inspirasi Siswa dalam Belajar Matematika ; Studi Kasus Pengalaman Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika. 06(03), 82–103.

Su, F., & Wood, M. (2012). What makes a good university lecturer? Students’ perceptions of teaching excellence. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/17581181211273110

Sviatlana, A., Alena, B., Sviatlana, V., Natallia, D., Dzmitry, D., & Tatsiana, Z. (2021). Humour As Professionally. 01019, 1–7.

Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(5), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020

Thrash, T. M. (2021). The creation and curation of all things worthy: Inspiration as vital force in persons and cultures. Advances in Motivation Science, 8(February), 181–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.01.002

Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a Psychological Construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.871

Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2004). Inspiration: Core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 957–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.957

Wang, S. (2022). The Influence of Teacher’s Authoritative Behavior on Students. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities and Arts (SSHA 2022), 653(Ssha), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220401.120

Wilson, M., & Goldenberg, M. P. (1998). Some Conceptions are Difficult to Change: One Middle School Mathematics Teacher’s Struggle. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(1), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009990018385

Downloads

Published

2022-09-07

How to Cite

Simamora, R. E., Darmayasa, J. B., & Kamara, J. G. (2022). Why is the mathematics educator called inspiring?. Journal of Honai Math, 5(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v5i2.334

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Honai Math

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Journal of Honai Math Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/jhm/about
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Journal of Honai Math agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.