Examining purposeful researchable questions in mathematics education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v5i2.260Keywords:
Mathematics Education, Purposeful Researchable Questions, Research Methods and Designs, Theoretical and Conceptual FrameworksAbstract
Often general, and frequently involving scholarly concepts, research questions are the cornerstone of studies. Thus, from their precise wording to their context, research questions play a vital role in uncovering information, determining answers given by participants, and drawing conclusions. However, poorly structured research questions and misalignments to purpose within theoretical and empirical studies can lead to miscommunication and unanswered queries. To this point, this paper discusses the importance of asking purposeful researchable questions in mathematics education and examines what purposeful questioning in mathematics education using quantitative and qualitative research designs entails. An extensive review of literature, is presented with the purpose of identifying strategies for asking purposeful questions, exploring various criteria for judging researchable questions in mathematics education, and discussing the importance of aligning research questions to methodology and frameworks. The key findings reveal that ambiguities of language and the powerful force of context in interpreting the meaning of questions and answers could influence the impact of studies. Implications exist for mathematics and science education scholars who, face various challenges in asking questions that will produce what they want to know. The paper concludes with a brief discussion as to the significance and possibilities of purposeful researchable questions in mathematics education.
References
Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 22(4), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390902736512
Arghode, V. (2012). Qualitative and quantitative research: Paradigmatic differences. Global Education Journal, 2012(4), 155-165.
Babbie, E. R. (2010). The practice of social research. 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., . . . Tsai, Y. (2010). Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Bernard, H. R. (2012). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.
Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The Definitive guide to questionnaire design-for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bullock, E. C. (2012). Conducting “good†equity research in mathematics education: A question of methodology. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 3(2), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v3i2.752
Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Cirillo, M., . . . Hiebert, J. (2019). Posing significant research questions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(2), 114-134. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.2.0114
Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., & Hiebert, J. (2017). A future vision of mathematics education research: Blurring the boundaries of research and practice to address teachers' problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(5), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.5.0466
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Capobianco, B. M., & Feldman, A. J. (2010). Repositioning teacher action research in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 909–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9219-7
Cashman, C. S., & McCraw, P. (1993). Conducting qualitative research in instructional technology: Methods and techniques. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=eric&AN=ED362155&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=wgc1
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2007). Grounded theory. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (Seventh edition. ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall.
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., . . . Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428-1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step by step (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., Bailey, D. H., & Krueger, F. (2013). Adolescents' functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS ONE, 8(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054651
Geary, D. C., & vanMarle, K. (2016). Young children's core symbolic and nonsymbolic quantitative knowledge in the prediction of later mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 2130-2144. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000214
Gherardi, S. (2012). How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods. Cheltenham, U.K.
Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034699
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
Harper, F. K. (2017). Coming to understand the big issues: remaking meaning of social justice through mathematics across the school year. Mathematics Education and Life at Times of Crisis, 513.
Harris, A. D., McGregor, J. C., Perencevich, E. N., Furuno, J. P., Zhu, J., Peterson, D. E., . . . Finkelstein, J. (2006). The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1749
Hart, L. C., Smith, S. Z., Swars, S. L., & Smith, M. E. (2009). An examination of research methods in mathematics education (1995-2005). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325771
Heid, M. K. (2010). Where’s the math (in mathematics education research)? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 102-103. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0102
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
Hoover, M., Mosvold, R., Ball, D. L., & Lai, Y. (2016). Making progress on mathematical knowledge for teaching. Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1/2), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1363
Huang, K., Yeomans, M., Brooks, A. W., Minson, J., & Gino, F. (2017). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 430-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000097
Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1993). The art of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacher–researchers. New York: Heinemann.
Hulley, S. B. E., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D. G., Hearst, N., & Newman, T. (2001). Conceiving the research question. Designing clinical research, 335.
Hulley, S. B. E. (2007). Designing clinical research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Janesick, V. J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. Handbook of qualitative research, 379-399.
Kearney, W. S., & Garfield, T. (2019). Student readiness to learn and teacher effectiveness: Two key factors in middle grades mathematics achievement. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 42(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1607138
Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers' analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1/2), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347875
Kollosche, D. (2018). Social functions of mathematics education: A framework for socio-political studies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9818-3
Lach, D. (2014). Challenges of interdisciplinary research: Reconciling qualitative and quantitative methods for understanding human-landscape systems. Environmental Management, 53(1), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0115-8
Larkin, K., & Jorgensen, R. (2016). 'I hate maths: Why do we need to do maths?' Using ipad video diaries to investigate attitudes and emotions towards mathematics in year 3 and year 6 students. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 14(5), 925-944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9621-x
Lesh, R., & Lovitts, B. (2000). Research agendas: Identifying priority problems, and developing useful theoretical perspectives. In A. E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 45–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE.
Maasepp, B., & Bobis, J. (2015). Prospective primary teachers' beliefs about mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 89-107.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing qualitative research, (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Martin, D. B. (2003). Hidden assumptions and unaddressed questions in mathematics for all rhetoric. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 7-21.
Mattick, K., Johnston, J., & de la Croix, A. (2018). How to…write a good research question. Clinical Teacher, 15(2), 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12776
Merriam, S. B. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative & qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Muijs, D. (2010). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
Neuman, W. L., & Robson, K. (2004). Basics of social research. Pearson.
Pais, A., Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2010). Broadening the role of theory in mathematics education research. Mathematics and Mathematics Education: Cultural and Social Dimensions, 189-199. http://matematikdidaktik.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/MADIF7.pdf#page=197
Park, J., & Park, M. (2016). Qualitative versus quantitative research methods: Discovery or justification? Journal of Marketing Thought, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.15577/jmt.2016.03.01.1
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2006). Hopes of progress and fears of the dangerous: Research, Cultural theses, and planning different human kinds. In G. J. Ladson-Billings & W. F. Tate IV (Eds.), Educational Research in the Public Interest (pp. 119–140). New York: Teachers College Press.
Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage Publications.
Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: Sage.
Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 14(2), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194060
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2008). Research methods in (mathematics) education. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 467–519). New York: Routledge.
Sharma, S. (2013). Qualitative approaches in mathematics education research: Challenges and possible solutions. Education Journal, 2(2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20130202.14
Silver, E. A. (2004). Ella minnow pea: An allegory for our times? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(3), 154-156. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.35.3.0154
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: The Guilford Press.
Tolmie, A., McAteer, E., & Muijs, D. (2011). Quantitative methods in educational and social research using SPSS. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
Worthington, M., & van Oers, B. (2016). Pretend play and the cultural foundations of mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1120520
Xu, D., & Dadgar, M. (2018). How effective are community college remedial math courses for students with the lowest math skills? Community College Review, 46(1), 62-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552117743789
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014
Young, J. L., Young, J. R., & Ford, D. Y. (2017). Standing in the gaps: Examining the effects of early gifted education on black girl achievement in STEM. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(4), 290-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17730549
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Journal of Honai Math Posting Your Article Policy at http://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/jhm/about
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Journal of Honai Math agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
